Back to gotFeedback
District AI Index — Vendor Score Report
gotFeedback
by gotLearning · Report generated 4/13/2026
District AI Index — Vendor Score Report
gotFeedback
by gotLearning · Generated 4/13/2026
Executive Summary
7.4
Overall Score (of 10)
Recommended with Caveats
Rating
Teacher Use Only
Privacy Status
Freemium
Pricing Model
“Addresses a real pain point — teacher feedback at scale.”
Dimension Score Breakdown
8
Ease of Use
Weight: 20%
Strong
8
Instructional Value
Weight: 40% (highest)
Strong
6
Data Privacy
Weight: 20%
Needs Improvement
7
Accessibility
Weight: 20%
Adequate
Ease of Use
8/10Strong
Strengths
- Clean, well-designed interface that teachers can adopt quickly
- Free tier available for individual teacher evaluation
Gaps Identified
- No LMS or rostering integrations listed
Recommendations to Improve Score
- Add LMS integrations (Google Classroom, Canvas, Schoology) to reduce deployment friction
- Support Clever and/or ClassLink for district rostering
Instructional Value
8/10Strong
Strengths
- Strong instructional alignment with clear classroom applications
- Versatile use cases: Student feedback, Grading acceleration, Personalized comments
- Rich feature set with 4 documented capabilities
- Clear instructional fit documentation provided
Gaps Identified
- Significant limitations: Lesson planning, Interactive activities
Recommendations to Improve Score
- Publish detailed alignment documentation to pedagogy, standards, and instructional frameworks (UDL, Bloom's)
- Consider pursuing alignment documentation with Common Core, NGSS, or state-specific standards
Data Privacy
6/10Needs Improvement
Strengths
- Basic privacy practices in place
Gaps Identified
- FERPA Compliant: Partially documented — needs completion
- COPPA Compliant: Not documented — critical gap for district adoption
- DPA Available: Not documented — critical gap for district adoption
- SOC 2 Type II: Not documented — critical gap for district adoption
- Overall privacy level assessed as 'Medium' — not yet District Ready
Recommendations to Improve Score
- Obtain and publish FERPA compliance documentation — this is a gate requirement for most US school districts
- Verify and document COPPA compliance if the tool is used by or collects data from students under 13
- Prepare a standard Data Processing Agreement (DPA) template that districts can sign — many states require this
- Pursue SOC 2 Type II certification to demonstrate security controls to enterprise buyers
- Explicitly document whether user/student data is used for AI model training — districts will ask
Accessibility
7/10Adequate
Strengths
- Basic web accessibility practices in place
Gaps Identified
- No VPAT/ACR document published — districts with Section 508 requirements will flag this
- Accessibility assessed as 'Moderate' — gaps likely exist in WCAG conformance
- Insufficient accessibility documentation provided
Recommendations to Improve Score
- Commission a VPAT 2.5 / Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR) and publish it on your website — this is increasingly a procurement requirement
- Conduct a WCAG 2.1 Level AA audit and address identified gaps
- Ensure full keyboard navigation throughout the application
- Test with screen readers (VoiceOver, NVDA, JAWS) and document compatibility
- Reference specific WCAG success criteria in your accessibility documentation
Compliance Gaps
| Signal | Current Status | Action Required |
|---|---|---|
| FERPA Compliant | partial | Complete FERPA Compliant documentation and publish publicly |
| COPPA Compliant | Not documented | Obtain COPPA Compliant certification/documentation |
| DPA Available | Not documented | Obtain DPA Available certification/documentation |
| SOC 2 Type II | Not documented | Obtain SOC 2 Type II certification/documentation |
VPAT / ACR Assessment
StatusNot published
ImpactDistricts with Section 508 obligations may be unable to procure this tool
RecommendationCommission a VPAT 2.5 ACR and publish it publicly on your accessibility page
Priority Actions to Improve Score
The following actions would have the highest impact on your District AI Index score, listed in priority order:
- 1Obtain and publish FERPA compliance documentation — this is a gate requirement for most US school districts
- 2Verify and document COPPA compliance if the tool is used by or collects data from students under 13
- 3Prepare a standard Data Processing Agreement (DPA) template that districts can sign — many states require this
- 4Pursue SOC 2 Type II certification to demonstrate security controls to enterprise buyers
- 5Explicitly document whether user/student data is used for AI model training — districts will ask
Scoring Methodology
Scores are assigned by the District AI Index editorial team across four dimensions. Instructional Value carries the highest weight (40%) because our primary audience — educators and district leaders — prioritize tools that genuinely improve teaching and learning. Overall Score = (Ease × 0.20) + (Instructional Value × 0.40) + (Privacy × 0.20) + (Accessibility × 0.20). Scores are not influenced by listing tier, affiliate status, or vendor relationships.
Full methodology: districtaiindex.com/editorial-policy
Questions About This Report?
If you believe any information is inaccurate or have updated compliance documentation, contact our editorial team.
Contact Editorial Team